New Housing Rebate for Owner-Built Homes – D’Ambrosio 2014 TCC 63

Download PDF

New Housing Rebate for Owner Built Homes under the Excise Tax Act

D’Ambrosio v The Queen, 2014 TCC 63

The taxpayer built a home on a property jointly owned by himself, his spouse, and his tree children, and claimed the rebate for owner-built homes under the Excise Tax Act, paragraph 256(2)(a), which provides:

Rebate for owner-built homes — Where

(a)   a particular individual constructs or substantially renovates, or engages another person to construct or substantially renovate for the particular individual, a residential complex that is a single unit residential complex or a residential condominium unit for use as the primary place of residence of the particular individual or a relation of the particular individual, …

the Minister shall, subject to subsection (3), pay a rebate to the particular individual equal to the amount determined by the formula …

The taxpayer claimed that the house was the property was the primary residence of his son, and appeared to base this on the fact that this was the only property owned by the son.  However, the evidence showed that the son lived (address on tax returns and driver’s license) and worked (T4 slips) in Toronto. Also, the evidence based on hyro bills shows that the home was only occupied during the summer months.

The Court referred to the decision in Yang v R, 2009 TCC 636, where some of the factors relevant to the determination were provided:

Some of these factors are the following: the parties’ intention with regard to the use of the housing unit as their primary residence; their length of stay at the new unit; the address they use for correspondence; when they moved in and when they moved their personal belongings, and if the move was delayed, what events occurred that caused the delay; details of the insurance coverage; what they did with their former residence or rental unit; and other factors that may be relevant depending on the facts of the case.

The son was unable to provide evidence that he moved into the property, or otherwise that the property was his primary residence.

– Sas Ansari, BSc BEd PC JD LLM PhD (exp) CPA In-Depth Tax 1, 2 &3

If you like this website, please share with others and consider supporting us with a donation.

Back To Top OR Home